<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I am John Galt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johngaltusa.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com</link>
	<description>JohnGaltUSA.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/if-you-think-health-care-is-expensive-now-wait-until-you-see-what-it-costs-when-it%e2%80%99s-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/if-you-think-health-care-is-expensive-now-wait-until-you-see-what-it-costs-when-it%e2%80%99s-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quote of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/if-you-think-health-care-is-expensive-now-wait-until-you-see-what-it-costs-when-it%e2%80%99s-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin. Bankruptcies and losses concentrate the mind on prudent behavior&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/capitalism-without-failure-is-like-religion-without-sin-bankruptcies-and-losses-concentrate-the-mind-on-prudent-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/capitalism-without-failure-is-like-religion-without-sin-bankruptcies-and-losses-concentrate-the-mind-on-prudent-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quote of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin. Bankruptcies and losses concentrate the mind on prudent behavior&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin. Bankruptcies and losses concentrate the mind on prudent behavior&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/capitalism-without-failure-is-like-religion-without-sin-bankruptcies-and-losses-concentrate-the-mind-on-prudent-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2680/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2680/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Underground]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/2680/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.johngaltusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/805.png"><img src="http://www.johngaltusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/805.png" alt="805" title="805" width="525" height="525" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2669" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2680/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2670/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2670/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Underground]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/2670/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.johngaltusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/1018.jpg"><img src="http://www.johngaltusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/1018.jpg" alt="1018" title="1018" width="600" height="450" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2659" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2670/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you rather have the &#8220;party of no&#8221; or the party of don&#8217;t no running the country?</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/would-you-rather-have-the-party-of-no-or-the-party-of-dont-no-running-the-country/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/would-you-rather-have-the-party-of-no-or-the-party-of-dont-no-running-the-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thought for the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you rather have the &#8220;party of no&#8221; or the party of don&#8217;t no running the country?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you rather have the &#8220;party of no&#8221; or the party of don&#8217;t no running the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/would-you-rather-have-the-party-of-no-or-the-party-of-dont-no-running-the-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;You cant make a weak man strong by making a strong man weak.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/you-cant-make-a-weak-man-strong-by-making-a-strong-man-weak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/you-cant-make-a-weak-man-strong-by-making-a-strong-man-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>trena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quote of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;You cant make a weak man strong by making a strong man weak.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You cant make a weak man strong by making a strong man weak.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/you-cant-make-a-weak-man-strong-by-making-a-strong-man-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Biggest Business in America</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/the-biggest-business-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/the-biggest-business-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8221; The biggest business in America is not steel, automobiles, or television. It is the manufacture, refinement, and distribution of anxiety.&#8221; &#8211; Eric Sevaried
The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009 it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, the start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The biggest business in America is not steel, automobiles, or television. <strong><em>It is the manufacture, refinement, and distribution of anxiety.&#8221;</em></strong> &#8211; Eric Sevaried<span id="more-2667"></span></p>
<p>The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009 it was actually January 3rd 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, the start of the 110th Congress. The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.</p>
<p>For those who are listening to the  liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is &#8220;Bush&#8217;s Fault&#8221;, think about this:<br />
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:</p>
<p>At the time:</p>
<p>* The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77<br />
* The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%<br />
* The Unemployment rate was 4.6%<br />
* George Bush&#8217;s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!</p>
<p>Remember the day&#8230;</p>
<p>January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.</p>
<p>The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?</p>
<p>BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!</p>
<p>* Thank Congress for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment to this CRISIS by dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fiasco&#8217;s!</p>
<p>(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie &amp; Freddie &#8211; starting in 2001, because it was financially risky for the U.S. economy, but no one was listening).</p>
<p>* And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac?   OBAMA.</p>
<p>* And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie???<br />
OBAMA and the Democratic Congress.</p>
<p>So when someone tries to blame Bush&#8230;</p>
<p>REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007&#8230;. THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!&#8221; Bush may have been in the car, but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving. Set the record straight on Bush!</p>
<p>So, as you listen to all the commercials and media from the Democrats who are now distancing themselves from their voting record and their party, remember how they didn&#8217;t listen to you when you said you didn&#8217;t want all the bailouts, you didn&#8217;t want the health care bill, you didn&#8217;t want cap and trade, you didn&#8217;t want them to continue spending money we don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not forgetting their complicity in getting us into this mess, and I&#8217;ll be marking my vote accordingly!</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not that liberals aren&#8217;t smart, it&#8217;s just that so much of what they know isn&#8217;t so&#8221; -Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/the-biggest-business-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Party Conservatives: Fixers or Spoilers?</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/third-party-conservatives-fixers-or-spoilers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/third-party-conservatives-fixers-or-spoilers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=2665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/third-party-conservatives-fixers-or-spoilers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MORT ZUCKERMAN on Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/mort-zuckerman-on-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/mort-zuckerman-on-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/?p=2662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A most interesting     editorial, not from Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but from Mortimer Zuckerman     of U.  S.  News. and World Report.
In a January 20, 2010     editorial, the Editor in Chief of  U.S.  News &#38; World     Report, Mortimer Zuckerman, had this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>A most interesting     editorial, not from Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but from Mortimer Zuckerman     of U.  S.  News. and World Report.</em></strong><span id="more-2662"></span></p>
<p>In a January 20, 2010     editorial, the Editor in Chief of  <em>U.S.  News &amp; World     Report</em>, Mortimer Zuckerman, had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama&#8217;s ability to     connect with voters is what launched him.  But what has surprised me     is how he has failed to connect with the voters since he&#8217;s been in     office.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s had so much     overexposure.  You have to be selective.  He was doing five     Sunday shows.  How many press conferences?  And now people stop     listening to him… He&#8217;s lost his audience.  He has not rallied public     opinion.  He has plunged in the polls more than any other public     figure since we&#8217;ve been using polls.  He&#8217;s done everything     wrong.  Well, not everything, but the major things… I don&#8217;t consider     it a triumph.  I consider it a disaster.  And that&#8217;s what his     friends are saying about him.</p>
<p>As the boy president     occupied the White House on January 20, 2009, it was predictable that his     presidency would last a year, at most, because the things he promised and     the things he stood for were so uniquely un-American.  Looking back     over his year in office, any reasonably precocious fourth grader could make     a cogent argument in opposition to nearly everything he&#8217;s done.  In     fact, his policies have been so extreme and so far outside the mainstream     that he was destined to achieve the most spectacular fall from grace of any     American president in history.  It was easy to see him serving out the     final three years of his term as a virtual exile in the White House… afraid     to venture out among any but the most rabid partisans.</p>
<p>Seeing his most ambitious     initiative, healthcare reform, die in the flames of the Massachusetts     Massacre, Obama made a hastily-planned &#8217;sortie&#8217; to Ohio for yet another     Bush-bashing, self-aggrandizing stump speech on job creation.  It was     vintage Obama… full of left wing hyperbole and planted questions from the     Kool- Ade drinkers in the hand-picked audience… but there were just two     things wrong with it: 1) Almost everything he said was either wrong or an     outright lie, and 2) He is so overexposed that no one in the television     audience really wanted to see him.</p>
<p>Obama Kool-Ade drinkers     in the media, and elsewhere, like to describe Obama as a &#8216;very bright man,     a true intellectual (compared to George W.  Bush and Sarah Palin, of     course).&#8217;  If that is the case, why has he demonstrated such a great     inability to learn from his failures?  The strident words and the     in-your-face attitude of his Ohio speech were proof that he has totally     misread the meaning of the Scott Brown victory in Massachusetts .</p>
<p>Whatever hopes and dreams     he had for his time in the White House, whatever grandiose plans he had for     transforming the United States from a constitutional republic with a free     market economy into a socialist dictatorship with a centrally planned     economy, were all lost on Tuesday, January 19, 2010… one day short of a     full year in office.  Yet, he appears to have learned nothing from the     experience.</p>
<p>Comedian George Gobel     once asked, rhetorically, &#8216;Did you ever get the feeling that the world was     a tuxedo and you were a pair of brown shoes?&#8217;  In the context of 21st     century American politics, and assuming that he has any capacity at all for     honest self-examination, Obama must be feeling today very much like a pair     of brown shoes at a black tie soiree.</p>
<p>When a politically naive     and totally inexperienced young black man, with a glib tongue and an     exceptional ability to read words convincingly from a teleprompter,     announced that he was ready to serve as President of the United States,     liberals and Democrats saw it as a perfect opportunity to expiate whatever     white guilt they may have felt… which was apparently considerable among     those on the political left.  It didn&#8217;t seem to bother them that, as     one pundit has remarked, &#8216;every time he walks into a room he is the least     experienced and the least qualified man in the room.&#8217; Nevertheless, his     friends in the worldwide socialist movement and the international banking community     figured out how to smuggle hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal     campaign funds into the country, the black community rallied to his banner,     and American liberals and the mainstream media jumped on board the     bandwagon.  Together, they made it happen for him.  But now, just     one year later, Obama appears destined to become the unhappiest man in     American politics… unhappier than even former Senator John Edwards, who     runs a close second, and former president Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Clinton will be the third     unhappiest man because, after capturing the big prize, he frittered away     whatever chance he had of ever being compared favorably with Franklin     D.  Roosevelt as one of the 20th century&#8217;s greatest Democratic     presidents.  Not only was he a politician of unusual skill and     insight, he was widely known as a policy &#8216;wonk&#8217; among policy wonks, and he     had the drive and the personal charm to be loved and respected around the     world.  Unfortunately, he was never able to put the public trust at     the top of his priority list.  Instead, he surrounded himself with a     large cadre of trusted enablers who allowed him to conduct himself as if he     were, not the President of the United States , but the class stud on an     extended spring break in Acapulco .</p>
<p>Now that he&#8217;s been out of     office for nearly a decade and he&#8217;s married to the current Secretary of     State, he spends his days trying to find something useful to do without     calling an undue amount of attention to himself.  Having lied so     shamelessly to the American people, having perjured himself in a court of     law, having turned the Oval Office into a sexual playpen, and having     suffered the humiliation of impeachment, he&#8217;s smart enough to know that he     has little reputation left to protect.  So in order to protect     whatever legacy remains, he walks a tightrope every day… and he has many     more years to walk it without falling off.</p>
<p>Former Senator John     Edwards is destined to be the second unhappiest man in American politics     because he will be known forever as the most thoroughly despised scumbag in     the political arena.  A trial lawyer, Edwards amassed a $60 million     fortune by winning large jury awards against doctors, hospitals, and     corporations.  His specialty was cases in which children were born     with cerebral palsy, which he blamed on doctors who had waited too long to     perform C-sections, a claim that doctors and medical researchers have     described as &#8216;junk science.&#8217; Then, like Obama, he decided that his     experience in the courtroom, his glib tongue, and his one term in the U.S.       Senate qualified him to be President of the United States .  He     entered the 2004 Democratic presidential primaries, raising an incredible     amount of money for a newcomer to elective office… most of it raised     illegally by &#8216;bundlers&#8217; in plaintiffs&#8217; law firms across the country.      He was unsuccessful in his quest for the Democratic nomination but was     selected by his Senate colleague, John Kerry, as his running mate.</p>
<p>Two years later, in 2006,     Edwards met a young blonde film producer, Rielle Hunter, and embarked on a     love affair with her.  On February 27, 2008, Hunter gave birth to a     daughter, for whom Edwards has consistently denied paternity… until now.</p>
<p>Taking into account that     all of this was happening while his wife was waging a long battle with     breast cancer, Edwards now has the well-deserved reputation of being the     sleaziest of the sleazy.  He is so universally despised that, if he is     on the lookout for a friend, he might as well resign himself to getting a     dog… or moving in with O.J.<br />
Simpson.  Terry Moran, host of ABC&#8217;s This Week, put it all in     perspective.  He said, &#8216;What&#8217;s interesting to note is that Edwards&#8217;s     latest admission (that he is the father of Hunter&#8217;s child) came while he     was in Haiti .  As if the people of that sad place didn&#8217;t have enough     problems.&#8217; Clearly, the one thing Clinton and Edwards share that places     them near the top of our list is their sexual peccadilloes, a shortcoming     that Obama does not appear to share with them… at least from what we know     so far.</p>
<p>What we do know about     Obama is that, since his teen years, he has been mentored by, gravitated     toward, and surrounded by the most dangerous sort of America-hating     socialists, communists, and Marxists… from Frank Marshall Davis and Saul     Alinsky to Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn,     to Rev.  Jeremiah Wright, George Soros, and countless radical left     college professors.</p>
<p>What destines Obama for     the top spot on the list of unhappiest American politicians… aside from the     failure of his economic recovery program, the failure of his radical     cap-and-trade proposal, his failed attempt to give labor bosses     unprecedented power to intimidate blue collar workers, and his ill-fated     attempt at healthcare reform… is the fact that he carries on his shoulders     the hopes and aspirations of every black child in America.  It is     unfortunate that, because he is so far outside the American mainstream, and     because he carries so much hatred in his heart for the country he seeks to     lead, his failures will be viewed by generations of black children, not as     the failure of a black socialist attempting to bring down a constitutional     republic, but simply as the failure of a black man.</p>
<p>A man can fail in the     eyes of his countrymen and still be dearly loved by those closest to     him.  But in Obama&#8217;s case, his wife and his two daughters will be     there to suffer every agonizing step of his fall along with him.  And     for the rest of his life, each time he looks into their eyes, and into the     eyes of black people everywhere, he will see the crushing disappointment that     his ill-fated attempt at national transformation has caused them.</p>
<p>He will be the country&#8217;s     unhappiest man, living the rest of his life knowing that his daughters know     that the whole world sees him as a failure.  He is simply the wrong     man, in the wrong job, in the wrong country, at the wrong time in     history.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/mort-zuckerman-on-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2660/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2660/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Underground]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johngaltusa.com/2660/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WORKING THE SYSTEM
Wow, she must have been really good at her job.

At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post, January 24, 2009, was a column entitled, &#8220;Replacing Michelle&#8221; in the National Review, The Week.
Here it is as it appeared:
&#8220;Some employees are simply irreplaceable.  Take Michelle Obama: The University [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>WORKING THE SYSTEM</h2>
<p>Wow, she must have been really good at her job.<br />
<strong><br />
At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post, January 24, 2009, was a column entitled, &#8220;Replacing Michelle&#8221; in the National Review, The Week.</strong></p>
<p>Here it is as it appeared:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some employees are simply irreplaceable.  Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical center hired her in 2002 to run &#8216;programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting&#8217;.</p>
<p>In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 &#8211; nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator.</p>
<p>Her husband, Barak Obama, had just become a U.S. Senator.  He requested a $1 million &#8220;Earmark&#8221; for the UC Medical Center.  Way to network, Michelle!</p>
<p>Now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled.  How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?</p>
<p>Let me add that Michelle&#8217;s position was a part-time, 20-hours-a-week job.</p>
<p>My thoughts: How did this bit of &#8220;quid pro quo&#8221; (scratch my back &#8211; I&#8217;ll scratch yours) corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin&#8217;s garbage and kindergarten files?</p>
<p><strong>Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Depression is when you lose your job.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Recovery is when Obama loses his job!</strong></p>
<p>I hope this is forwarded so many times that the media will HAVE to cover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johngaltusa.com/2660/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

